VersusUFC research

Evaluation

Model results

Historical performance, data coverage and the limits of the estimates used in the research workspace.

Historical replay

These fight outcomes were already examined during development. Replaying them with corrected fighter records is useful for checking the model, but it is not independent validation.

Loading the evaluation for the research model…

How the data is divided

Training
Loading…
Calibration
Loading…
Model inputs
— features

Training fits the model. Calibration adjusts its probabilities on a separate period. The historical replay uses later fights whose outcomes have already been inspected.

Research coverage

Records through
Loading…
Fighters in lookup
—

Loading the current research coverage…

Coverage is different from evaluation

The research dataset can include newer records than a saved test. Each matchup report shows the fight history and sample available for those fighters.

What remains unproven

Historical accuracy does not establish an advantage over market prices. There is no demonstrated betting edge, and current injuries, camps and late changes are not fully captured by fight records.

Read the methodology →

Earlier project models Archived diagnostics

These are stored scores from the original project classifiers. They do not evaluate the corrected model used above. Preprocessing was fitted before cross-validation, so these scores are not independent holdout estimates.

Original classifiers · classification accuracy
ModelRandom-split CVChronological CV
Loading archived scores…